The New Orleans Pelicans have a 10th pick in the upcoming draft. Should they choose a player based on suitability or potential?
The Pelicans front desk is in an interesting position off the current season. The team is looking for Third coach in as many years. The five starters from last season are likely to be affected and could see as many as three-fifths of that unit leave town via trade. There is so much riding in the coming season for the front office that it will be hard to believe the extensions will be delivered if the Bills finish around 0.500 again.
Draft will play a major role Paving the way for the next season. Dreams of the Pels lottery were quickly quelled, as it was revealed that New Orleans would be putting up the tenth draft. This naturally led to some speculation that the team might consider using this selection as part of the A pack to add a star-level player next to Zion Williamson And Brandon Ingram. So far, there have been no reports that the front office is going in that direction.
As of now, it looks like the Pelicans will use this draft pick themselves. And why don’t they? If things break down right and the team improves on last year’s record, it should be the last time the New Orleans Pelicans relegated to the lottery for some time. This might be the best last chance to add a little piece to your list full of possibilities.
Should the front office target convenience or potential?
New Orleans Pelicans NBA Draft: Drafting based on potential
This is where it gets tricky. As I mentioned, the team has young potential all over the roster, but so far it doesn’t have much to show for it. Executive Vice President of Basketball Operations, David Griffin, mentioned the need to add shooting to a roster that was devoid of them last season. Obviously, the team can look at this skill during initial draft rehearsals and decide how much weight to put on the player’s talents.
In general, young players outside of college are seen as having more potential while older players are seen as more end products that can only improve a lot. I’m not here to imply that the entire NBA is thinking this way, there is reason for this conventional wisdom. Instead, this way of thinking is a good way to divide potential recruits into two groups.
Young players with potential are seen as having better chances of becoming star players to build a team around them. This possibility means that teams are willing to take more chances on these players and pick them higher in the draft. New Orleans would be too far from the top tier to bring an unmissable opportunity to Crescent City, but sometimes some gems slip through the cracks.
In this previous draft, Cole Anthony slipped to 15th overall. Now you might say, why offer a big deal to a player who didn’t even make an All-Rookie? Anthony was among the top five to get into college, and a downturn at UNU caused him to be drafted. This year he finished top five in every game and assists among the rookies, which isn’t a bad thing in the middle of the first round.
The downside to crafting a player based on their potential is that these players usually need time to grow and develop. Takes Jackson Hayesها For example, he was seen as a raw prospect who could become a decent player in the league if he gets the proper tutoring. Well, after two seasons, Hayes has become a rotation center for the Pels and someone I work with in the future.
New Orleans Pelicans NBA Draft: The Quest for Fitness
The opposite of phrasing for potential is phrasing for convenience. It’s the classic way in which your team takes the best available player regardless of position or do they take the best player in their most needed position. Obviously, if the answer to both questions is the same trigger, it’s very easy to spot a draft.
I think phrasing for convenience is what New Orleans should be doing in this draft. This could mean a few different things though. Do they want Best shooter available? How about the best defender on the board? For me, Pelicans have to shoot everything in this draft. I think the NBA might lean into League One, Two and Three. The more shooting on the ground, the better.
The New Orleans Pelicans weren’t a good three-point shooting team last season, they finished 26th on three percentage points as a team. In a league where the winning team often makes more triples, that can’t happen again. Shoot the Pels no matter the position and let the new trainer discover the turns.
There should be quite a few players available in the 10th pick who can bring their shoot to New Orleans. The player I’ve seen most often associated with New Orleans for this need is Cory Kisbert of Gonzaga, another option could be Moses Moody outside of Arkansas,
Or if the New Orleans Pelicans really wanted her wing, they could let her fly Cameron Thomas from LSU. I now know he’s not expected to go that high in the draft and Pels will probably trade and catch it while also adding another asset to the treasure trove but Thomas can deliver a solid result. Think of this as the Cam Johnson pick that Phoenix made two years ago. This choice was widely derided at the time, but Johnson was a big part of the Suns turning around.
Any recording that could be added with the 10th choice would be a welcome sight for me. Teams need players who can get you a bucket, and there is no longer room for defensive specialists. Even if you turn it becomes a respectable three-point shooter. If you can’t sign up today, you won’t see it’s time to play.
While all fans want their team selections to turn into star players, not everyone can be all-stars. Sometimes you just need to craft the right player to fit into your team’s main gears. I see a successful draft selection as someone who could be part of your master rotation. Get me someone who’s going to move into his second decade instead of the guy who dunks amazingly in the queues.